In the days when logs were floated down rivers to be processed, it was important for the lumber companies to reliably identify whose logs were whose. The Timber Marking Act was passed in 1870 and required logging firms in Ontario, Quebec and New Brunswick to register a unique identifying mark and then to stamp the cut trees with that symbol. Between 1870 and 1990, some 2,200 timber marks were registered.1 Failure to register and use a timber mark incurred a fine of $50, while wrongly applying a mark to someone else’s logs was also an offence, with a fine of up to $100.
This week, the archives heard from Peter Haughton of Bristol, Quebec, who has come into possession of a timber mark stamping hammer with a Deseronto connection. The hammer’s mark (a six-pointed star) was registered by Deseronto’s H. B. Rathbun & Son on July 18, 1870. Mr Haughton has been kind enough to share photographs of the hammer and also of the relevant page of The Lumberman’s Timber Mark Guide, which lists all the marks that the lumber companies had registered.
The page shows that the Rathbun Company had registered four different marks in 1870: perhaps a reflection of the scale of the timber limits that were being exploited by this firm. By 1890 The New York Times described the Rathbun Company as “the most valuable lumber manufacturing concern in Canada”.2 It also (slightly less accurately) located Deseronto “a few miles east of Toronto”.
1The Timber Marking Act is likely to be repealed, as logs are no longer transported down rivers in this way. A consultation on the proposal to repeal the Act is available from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office.
2The New York Times, November 4, 1890 ‘A big syndicate deal‘
March 9, 2010 at 9:38 pm
Hello Amanda
Thank you for your time & effort to share with others our love in learning the history of logging and of the rivers especially here in the Ottawa valley. I had never thought to look up the Timber Marking Act until you mentioned it on the website.
Peter & Barbara Haughton – Bristol, Quebec
March 10, 2010 at 11:48 pm
We have found at least one example of the Rathbun “R” timber mark on a floor joist in the lower level of St. Mark’s — the former Anglican Church in Deseronto (constructed between 1878-88). Thanks for the reference.
Paul Robertson, Deseronto
September 18, 2010 at 11:42 am
As a boy grouse hunting with my Dad.
I found a log marking hammer under a broken
down cast iron stove at a old log camp at
big bay Marq. Mi.
The markings on the hammer is C E.
How can I get more info on who it is regesterd to.
September 18, 2010 at 3:19 pm
Hi Dan
The Lumberman’s Timber Mark Guide is available online, courtesy of the University of Alberta Libraries. There’s a mark similar to the one you describe on page 26 – registered to Cameron and Edwards. This firm was based in Thurso, Quebec and in 1871 it merged with W. C. Edwards & Co. which was in Rockland, Ontario.
Hope that helps!
Amanda
June 12, 2011 at 11:43 pm
I have purchased a cedar log from the floor of an old horse barn (Windfield Farms) in Pickering, Ontario. It has a timber stamp that is not (as far as I can see) in the Timber Marking Guide mentioned here. What can I do? Help! I would love to know more about where this log cam from.
It looks like a J and a C joined back to back with a circle around them.
June 13, 2011 at 7:28 am
Hi Greg
I’ve had a look through the guide and the nearest I can see is one of the marks of J. McCuan (number 78, on p.67 of the online version). He was based in Fitzroy – is that the right mark?
Amanda
June 13, 2011 at 3:18 pm
Just updating my E-mail address — and compliments to the blogster for a great site!
Paul
December 15, 2011 at 12:24 pm
I have a log stamp that I found 60 years ago in the Fraser river near lytton BC. the stamp has a # 083 with an X below the number. the stamp is complete with the original handle. Thanks Joseph Boutin
December 17, 2011 at 12:02 pm
Hi Joseph
I can’t see anything like the stamp you describe in the 1874 guide available here: http://openlibrary.org/books/OL23351749M/The_lumberman's_timber_mark_guide – so perhaps this stamp was issued later. Sorry not to be able to help identify it.
Amanda
> —–Original Message—– >
August 10, 2012 at 11:33 am
Thanks for the link to the Timber Mark Guide. I cut the ends off a couple of very old, very deteriorated pine logs to be included a Historic Display at the Haliburton Scout Reserve (the logs were found on the Camp’s property). It is a blended HL mark, matching #106 in the guide, registered by A. Page of Belleville. The logs were next to the watershed draining into Drag Lake, east of Haliburton. Does it make sense that a company based in Belleville would have logging rights in the Haliburton/Wilberforce area?
August 10, 2012 at 1:09 pm
Hello Ken
I don’t know about that particular firm, but certainly the Rathbun Company’s timber limits extended a long way back into Northern Ontario, although they were based down in Deseronto, so it’s quite likely that the Belleville company’s would have done, too.
January 28, 2013 at 2:03 pm
Robert Burns My Grandfather Frank Burns worked all his life for the Rathbun Lumber Co. He first worked as a square Timber man and latter years as a camp forman .I have a Rathbun log stamp with a star.and I also have his broad axe some were around the farm.I intend to donate to our local musceum.
January 30, 2013 at 3:29 pm
Thanks for this information Robert – it’s interesting to hear about former employees of the Rathbun Company. And it’s quite surprising how many of the stamping hammers have survived.
November 18, 2015 at 10:04 pm
I own property which was originally patented and owned by the HB Rathbun Co in the 1800’s. Its way back in the bush, ATV access only north of Madoc, ON. This deer season I found rock dams on a creek on my property which were placed there either by HB Rathbun workers or possibly by native indians historically. They are clearly man-made. The three dams are geographically located in a manner which would allow the backing up of the creek my hunt camp is on. The largest one of them on the main channel of the creek must have washed out during a spring time freshette many many years ago allowing the water level in the creek to drop dramatically and leaving the other two now without purpose, high and dry in the bush on two dry swales which would form part of the creek flow if the creek water level were higher. The two swale dams are quite obvious when standing beside them. Only remnant edges of the main dam exist and those rocks pile edges are only apparent as a former dam if you care to concentrate on what you are looking at. A very interesting find that no one would know about or notice if you weren’t looking for them because they are so very remote back in very difficult to reach Canadian Shield bush. In fact, my very recent find may be of interest to anyone doing research on the logging activities of Hastings County loggers back in the 1800’s or specifically the HB Rathbun Co or perhaps Job Lingham and/or Joseph Canniff. Contact me if greater details are required.
November 20, 2015 at 5:46 pm
Thanks for commenting, Paul. An interesting discovery and I’m sure others will be intrigued by it, too.
December 20, 2015 at 12:26 pm
Hi I have found a marking hammer in the Mattawa area it has a square around the outer edge with a capital R In the centre of it none like any that are in the registry book. Can you give me I put as to whom it may belong please?
December 20, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Hi Richard – could it be G. Rainboth? He had a mark which is an R in a square (page 80 in the register, mark 292).
December 22, 2015 at 5:46 am
Maybe the R is this way R not like the one on their hammer like a font. No curl on it. I had been told it could be from the Riordon family but they are not shown. Thank you I will keep looking.
September 10, 2016 at 8:53 pm
I have several stamps on the beams in our mill in Queensborough. I see Rathbun’s but cannot identify the others.